Prof. Dr. Mike Sandbothe
printed version in: Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication. A special issue of AI & Society, Vol. 14, No. 1, edited by Charles Ess and Fay Sudweeks, London, Springer, 2000.
My considerations are organized in four sections. The first section provides a survey of some significant developments which today determine philosophical discussion on the subject of 'time'. In the second section it is shown how the question of time and the issue of media are linked with one another in the views of two influential contemporary philosophers - Jacques Derrida and Richard Rorty. Finally, in the third section, the temporal implications of cultural practices which are developing in the new medium of the Internet are analysed and, in the fourth section, related to the named authors' theses.
The current situation is characterized by a plurality of heterogenous time concepts. For this reason philosophical discussion about the problem of time assumes particular importance.1 Central to contemporary philosophy of time is the attempt to relate the varying time concepts developing in different scientific disciplines to one another, as well as to everyday experience and the technological time simulacra which are today increasingly shaping this experience. Different approaches which attempt to solve this task can be distinguished. They are embedded in the two following basic tendencies, which determine contemporary philosophy of time.
The first basic tendency in contemporary philosophy of time may be described as the tendency to unify and universalize our understanding of time. The protagonists of this tendency are convinced that the aspect of time should be considered a new Archimedean point, unifying our everyday experience of self and the world with our academic theories about humans and nature. This point of unity, they contend further, has been emphasized in philosophy (for instance by von Baader, Schelling, Bergson, Whitehead or Heidegger), but has been ignored for far too long by science and technology. It wasn't until the second half of this century that a universal time concept was developed and mathematically operationalized at the interface between physics, chemistry and biology - within the framework of the so-called theories of "self-organization"2 - which enabled the old duality of natural and historical time to be overcome.3 With this, some believe, the resolution of the conflict between physical and philosophical thinking on time which had characterized the start of the twentieth century is on the way.4 The German philosopher of time and history, Hermann Lübbe, for instance, highlighted in his book Im Zug der Zeit, "that even the temporal structure of historicality, which, according to Heidegger and the hermeneutic theory which followed him, results exclusively from the constitution of meaning in the subject's relationship to itself, is in reality a structure belonging to all open and dynamic systems, one indifferent to the subject matter."5
Lübbe's convergence thesis can claim support from the deliberations of the Nobel prize-winning physicist, chemist and one of the founders of self-organization theories of time, Ilya Prigogine. Already in 1973 Prigogine noted (referring to his thermodynamic theory of irreversibility): "Whatever the future of these ideas, it seems to me that the dialogue between physics and natural philosophy can begin on a new basis. I don't think that I can exaggerate by stating that the problem of time marks specifically the divorce between physics on one side, psychology and epistemology on the other. (...). We see that physics is starting to overcome these barriers."6 And in the closing chapter of his book From Being to Becoming, written in 1984, he adds: "It is remarkable to note the extent to which recent results [in natural science, M.S.] had been anticipated by philosophers like Bergson, Whitehead and Heidegger, whereby the main difference consists in that they could only make such inferences in contrast to science, whereas we are now observing that these insights emerge, so to speak, from scientific research itself."7
Some of those theories of time which attempt to analyse the problem of time from the perspective of media or technology theory are also to be ranked within the tendency toward unification and universalization of time described by Lübbe and Prigogine. Advocates of these theories, most of which argue post-historically, stress that the time concept of self-organization theories, supposedly discovered as a basic structure of nature and history, is in truth nothing but the scientific ennoblement of a technological temporality of simulation produced in complex computational models. Hence, unlike Lübbe, the French dromologist Paul Virilio describes the establishment of the new unitary technological time not as the universalization of historical temporal structures, but far more as being their radical destruction. Virilio's basic media-philosophical diagnosis states that the "cinématique"8 technologies which have spread in the twentieth century aim at a radical dissolution of those temporal structures which have been considered as ineluctable basic constituents of human existence from Augustine through to Heidegger.9
For Virilio this strong destructive thesis is at the same time linked with the idea of a trans-human time regime of pure speed,10 inscribing itself in the human soul worldwide via television and computer networks. The transition from the old opposition between natural and historical time to the new uniform simulatory time of technology comprises, according to Virilio, the essentially apocalyptic logic of the occidental history of technology. Against this background the unification and universalization of time marked by science and technology is described by him not (as by Lübbe or Prigogine) as the originary discovery of an inner convergence point between nature and history, but as the technological victory of inauthentic, natural time stuctures over the authentic temporality of history. Of course, from Virilio's perspective, shaped by Christianity, this can only amount to a Pyrrhic victory, since the history of suppression, inaugurated by the technological Fall of Man, continues, for Virilio, to testify ex negativo the hidden unity of an eschatological temporality which alone can lay claim to true universality.
The second basic tendency in contemporary philosophy of time is best understood when one first reminds oneself of the basic presupposition common to the advocates of the unification and universalization tendency. Time is apprehended by them as being a uniform and universal basic structure, exempt from historical contingency and cultural change. Thus Lübbe and Prigogine consider self-evident the "ontological universality of the aspect of temporality"11 in the "participatory universe"12 of self-organization which envelops man and nature. And Virilio's programme of critical exposure is underlain by the religiously motivated idea of the story of decline of a divinely preordained temporality occurring under the banner of technological evolution branded as 'devilish'.
Supporters of the second tendency, the tendency to historize and relativize time, assume in contrast that the role time plays for human understanding of self and the world is a system of practical and technical habits which are culturally divergent and, within individual cultures, subject to change in contingent conditions over time. The American pragmatist Richard Rorty supports this approach with particular refinement. According to Rorty, radical thinking about time must do away with the theologically founded conception that time and eternity come together in the human.13 Instead Rorty demands, "that we [should] try to get to the point where we no longer worship anything, where we treat nothing as a quasi divinity, where we treat everything - our language, our conscience, our community - as a product of time and chance."14 According to Rorty, we will only achieve this when we no longer mystify time, but understand it in a radically reflexive way as being a product of chance.15
The interrelations between the conceptions of time currently discussed in academia, as well as the question of the relationship between scientific time concepts, technological time simulacra, and our everyday understanding of time, are to be dealt with pragmatically on the basis of the historization tendency advocated by Rorty. The convergence of different vocabularies of time emphasized by supporters of the unification and universalization tendency is, from Rorty's perspective, by no means proof of an intrinsic coincidence between natural and historical time or some inner tendency of modern technology to destroy time. The mathematical and technological operationalization and successful functionalization of the vocabulary which, until now, has served the purposes of human self-description illustrate only the historical ability to adapt, inner flexibility and contextual boundness of even so highly attuned vocabularies as those found in physics, mathematics, or logic. The different vocabularies which we make use of for differing purposes and in varying contexts are accordingly to be understood neither as convergent in an intrinsic sense, nor as founding or destroying one another in an eschatological sense. Rather, they are themselves subject to change over time, through which they become related and disjoined in various and contingent ways according to the various historical situations which arise.
The radical temporalization of time expressed in these deliberations had already been outlined in literature by the Austrian novelist Robert Musil. In his novel The Man without Qualities he writes, "The train of events is a train unrolling its rails ahead of itself. The river of time is a river sweeping its banks along with it. The traveller moves about on a solid floor between solid walls; but the floor and the walls are being moved along too, imperceptibly, and yet in very lively fashion, by the movements that his fellow-travellers make."16 The inner reflexivity in the modern apprehension of time, articulated here by Musil, was founded within modern philosophy by the differing approaches of Kant and Heidegger respectively.17 Whereas, however, Kant and Heidegger throughout their relativizations simultaneously tried secretly to universalize time anew, the media-philosophical analyses of the problem of time proposed by Jacques Derrida can be registered in the horizon of a radical relativization and historization of time opened up with recourse to Rorty.
In his collection of essays The Transparent Society Gianni Vattimo, the Italian pioneer of postmodernity,18 advocates the "hypothesis" that "the intensification of communicative phenomena and the increasingly prominent circulation of information, with news flashed around the world (or McLuhan's 'global village') as it happens, are not merely aspects of modernization amongst others, but in some way the centre and the very sense of this process."19 Vattimo's hypothesis is shared by Jacques Derrida. In the essay The Other Heading - Reflections on Today's Europe Derrida formulated his basic media-philosophical diagnosis with a view to Europe as follows: "European cultural identity cannot (...) renounce (...) the great avenues or thoroughfares of translation and communication, and thus, of mediatization. But, on the other hand, it cannot and must not accept the capital of a centralizing authority (...). For by constituting places of an easy concensus, places of a demagogical and 'salable' consensus, through mobile, omnipresent, and extremely rapid media networks, by thus immediately crossing every border, such normalization would establish a cultural capacity at any place and at all times. It would establish a hegemonic center, the power center or power station [la centrale], the media center or central switchboard [le central] of the new imperium: remote control as one says in English for the TV, a ubiquitous tele-command, quasi-immediate and absolute."20 What's expressed in this diagnosis is the inner ambivalence with regard to the basic structures of our understanding of the world and ourselves which is emerging in the wake of the comprehensive mediatization of human experience of time. On the one hand lies an indispensable chance in this for the constitution of "European cultural identity"; on the other hand it harbours the danger of "a hegemonic center's" establishing itself, one which might soar to become the media centre of a new imperium.
The thesis, underlying these thoughts, that historical change in our forms of communication and technological media assumes significance for the philosophy of time was developed by Derrida in the sixties in his early major philosophical work Of Grammatology. With recent "development of [...] practical methods of information retrieval"21 in view he there unfurled the programme of a time-philosophical analysis of modern mass media22 which had taken shape with Benjamin23 and Heidegger24 in the first half of the century and been taken up by Anders25 and McLuhan26 in the fifties and at the start of the sixties. Derrida's basic thesis in Of Grammatology is that the form of phonetic writing (i.e. one oriented towards the model of spoken language) which until now has defined the occident favours a certain understanding of time, namely that of the "linearist"27 concept of time centred around the temporal dimension of "presence".28 However, with the transition from the dominance of the phonetic type of writing, oriented toward the presence of the signified in the voice, to a "nonphonetic"29 type of writing there results, so Derrida continues, a "deconstruction of presence"30 and hence the transition to a "delinearized temporality".31 From this Derrida, in Of Grammatology, draws the necessary conclusion of abandoning modern philosophy of time's classical vocabulary: "The concepts of present, past, and future, everything in the concepts of time and history which implies evidence of them - the metaphysical concept of time in general - cannot adequately describe the structure of the trace."32
The metaphors of the trace and the "différance"33 are put forward by Derrida so as to enable deconstructive thinking about time. The details of how a theory of time based on this might look is made clear by Derrida neither in Of Grammatology nor in his later works. The reason for this is that, according to Derrida, the structure of delinearized thinking about time is inchoate and can hence only be anticipated negatively in permanent deconstruction, the execution of which Derrida's writing has commited itself to, right through to his most recent publications.
In contrast to Derrida, Rorty has until now only dealt with issues of media and time philosophy in passing. Nonetheless the guidelines for a pragmatic theory of time and media can be inferred from Rorty's scattered comments on this topic. In his considerations Rorty goes one step beyond Derrida. He advocates the thesis that with the end of epistemology, already diagnosed in his Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature,34 and with the transfer to a pragmatic variant of hermeneutics not only has the classical vocabulary of temporality become obsolete, but the philosophical question about time altogether. He directs this thesis not only against the epistemological mainstream which determines the tradition of modern philosophy, but also against Derrida's grammatological deconstructivism.
Rorty criticizes Derrida and his followers for overestimating the public, political dimension of deconstructivism.35 Rorty is of the view that Derrida's actual strength first finds expression in his more recent works. This strength lies, according to Rorty, in giving up the transcendental project of an "ironist theory",36 which still determined Of Grammatology, and replacing it with "private allusions"37 in order to personalize philosophy by "falling back on private fantasy".38 In texts such as Derrida's The Post Card39 Rorty admires the author's "having had the courage to give up the attempt to unite the private and the public"40 and having instead consistently spelt out philosophy as a private project of individual self-creation. And Rorty criticizes Of Grammatology insofar as its centre is formed by the attempt - which in its criticism of metaphysics itself remains metaphysical - to develop a 'negative' theory of time as a phenomenon of "trace, reserve, or differance".41
Rorty's comments about media are also to be understood against this background. They are based on the lesson, gained from Proust, that "novels are a safer medium than theory".42 More important than a profound media theory grounded on a philosophy of time is, in Rorty's view, the practical efficacy which can derive from narrative media such as "the novel, the movie, and the TV program".43 Rorty's concern here is primarily with content, that is, with the concrete narratives, which are offered by the media. They are to contribute to bringing us further in the "process of coming to see other human beings as 'one of us' rather than as 'them'".44 The central task of the media lies, according to Rorty, in the creation of concrete solidarity between people who have grown up with different vocabularies and who could learn step by step through the media to intertwine their vocabularies with one another.45
The philosophical analyses, presented by Derrida, of the deep implications which media technologies could develop for the basic structures of human temporality appear, from Rorty's viewpoint, to be a vain undertaking destined to failure. Indeed one must agree with Rorty that the in-depth media-philosophical hermeneutics outlined in Derrida's Grammatology are a kind of historized transcendental philosophy. Nonetheless Rorty will be unable to deny that the attentiveness to the temporal forms and perceptive structures which are establishing themselves in the tele-technological interplay between human and machine is an important factor to be considered when judging the solidarity-inducing effects which can derive from electronic media. In the following two sections of my considerations I would like to attempt to bring together both aspects - that of 'content' accentuated by Rorty and the 'formal' aspect foregrounded by Derrida - by taking a look at the Internet.
In 1995 the American computer sociologist Sherry Turkle published a book entitled Life on the Screen. Identity in the Age of the Internet which can already be considered a classic of humanities Internet research. In this book the author advocates the interesting thesis that the concrete conditions of experience in the Internet make accessible a multitude of those relationships formulated by Derrida and other postmodern philosophers in the sixties and seventies as complex theorems in esoteric language. Turkle describes the Internet's computer mediated communication against this background as an experience through which Derrida's thinking is brought "down to earth".46 George P. Landow and Jay David Bolter had already arrived at similar results in the eighties in their investigations into the basic hypertextual structures of electronic textuality used on stand alone computers. Thus Landow, in his book Hypertext. Convergences of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology, emphasizes that "something that Derrida and other critical theorists describe as part of a seemingly extravagant claim about language turns out precicely to describe the new economy of reading and writing with electronic virtual (...) forms."47 And Bolter makes clear in his book Writing Space. The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing that "the electronic medium can demonstrate easily what Derrida could only describe laboriously in print (...)."48
I would like to illuminate more closely the background to the view advocated by Turkle, Landow and Bolter - the view that in the Internet basic ideas of postmodern philosophy are coming into their own as concrete communications practices - by looking at Derrida's grammatological deconstruction of the linear concept of time. My guiding thesis in doing this is that the pragmatic line of argument which Rorty defends against Derrida gains particular relevance in view of the Internet. What requires complex philosophical deconstructions in the medium of the printed book, becomes a pragmatic everyday experience by means of a contingent change in the structure of media. The solidarity-inducing effect of the Internet's networked semiotic structures comes to light clearly in the factual emergence of "virtual communities".49 But it's not only, and not primarily, content which leads to solidarity. To this extent Derrida remains partially right against Rorty. It is the chance to shape together ourselves the conditions of presence which brings humanity together. In this temporal pragmatics lies the actual and fascinating dimension of the Internet which I would now like to talk about.
The World Wide Web's graphical user interface stands at the heart of the Internet today. The older, classical Internet services are to be distinguished from this. Counted among these older applications are services ranging from e-mail and talk, Net News and mailing lists, through to IRC, MUDs and MOOs. Common to all of these is that, in contrast to the hypertextual World Wide Web, they are oriented solely toward the model of linear textuality. Alterations in our practical dealings with signs which are relevant for the philosophy of time and media can already be ascertained in the use of these simple communications services. In the following I will restrict my analysis to these simple services.50 I would like to demonstrate such alterations using the Internet's three most important synchronous communications services as examples. By this I mean IRC, MUDs and MOOs.
IRC is the abbreviation for Internet Relay Chat, which is a complex communications landscape consisting of a multitude of different conversation fora, or channels. People meet here on-line from all over the world, using nicknames they have chosen themselves, in order to converse with one another in the written form, but nonetheless synchronously, and to exchange up to the minute information on diverse themes. The subject areas range from day-to-day net gossip and virtual flirting, technical questions concerning hardware and software, through to more or less academic conversations on literature, politics, philosophy, physics, medicine and other objects.51 IRC was developed in 1988 at the University of Oulu (Finland) by Jarkko Oikarinen.52
MUD is the abbreviation for Multi User Dungeon, which is a virtual gaming 'haunt'. A number of different participants log in simultaneously in a fictional text-based game landscape in order to collect so-called 'experience points' in combat with other players and programmed robots, and to advance in the respective game's hierarchy to being a 'wizard' or 'god'. Wizards and gods have the power to alter the game landscape and to program the problems which the other participants have to solve.53 The first MUD was created in 1979 by Richard Bartle and Roy Trubshaw at the University of Essex (Great Britain).54
MOO stands for Multi User Dungeon Object Oriented, which - in contrast to the strictly hierarchically organized and sometimes quite violent adventure MUDs - are games in which cooperation, solidarity, education and science are central. Every participant receives programming rights from the start, i.e. he or she can create rooms and objects and independently contribute to the shaping of the game landscape. It was James Aspnes, a graduate student at the Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, who, in 1989, came up with the idea of conceiving such democratic MUDs and thus foregrounding the development of virtual communities. In the USA MOOs have been being used for several years as interactive learning environments in which parents and children, pupils and teachers can together playfully gather experience with the new medium Internet.55
In IRC, MUDs and MOOs writing functions as a medium of direct synchronous communication between two or more conversation partners who are physically separated and who, as a rule, have never seen each other. Up to a point the anonymity peculiar to the textual medium of the book is connected in the pseudonymity of "on-line Chat" with the synchronous interactivity and immediate presence of the conversational partners which characterize spoken language in face to face communication. In computer mediated communication features which previously served as differential criteria for the distinction between language and writing are becoming entangled. The transitions between language and writing become fluid. The traditional distinction of spoken language as a medium of presence is undermined by the 'appresent presence' of the participants in the written conversation of on-line Chat.56 It is this performative writing of a conversation in which language is interactively written instead of spoken, that I call the tendency toward scriptualization of language.
Corresponding to this, as a parallel phenomenon, is a tendency toward the verbalization of writing. The medium of writing is used in the conditions of book printing as a distributive technology which excludes the immediate interaction between sender and receiver. In contrast, the Internet opens up possibilities for usage through which writing can be deployed as a medium permiting constant switches in position between sender and receiver in a flexible manner similar to that of spoken conversation. It is this language-like, that is reciprocal, usage form of an interactively used writing in conversational mode which I call the tendency toward verbalization of writing.
The parallel nature of the two transformation tendencies toward scriptualization of language and verbalization of writing indicates that neither of the two referents - neither spoken language nor writing - remains unaltered. In on-line Chat language functions as writing, that is, the spoken word realizes itself in writing as a sign of a sign. And at the same time writing functions in on-line Chat as an interactively modelable and contextually situated writing of language, that is, the written word is no longer misinterpreted as the sign of an authentic sign - with the latter itself being no longer sign-like - instead it is understood as being the sign of a sign of a sign and so on, i.e. as an unending semiotic process with a pragmatically determined relative end.57
Through the double decentralization of language and writing taking place in the Internet the grammatological fundament for a delinearized temporality is being prepared by media technology. Space and time are, from Derrida's perspective (unlike, say, that of Kant), not a priori forms of intuition transcendentally underlying the system of empirical signs. They are far more the effects of a grammatologically describable structure. To quote Derrida: "Origin of the experience of space and time, this writing of differance, this fabric of the trace, permits the difference between space and time to be articulated, to appear as such, in the unity of an experience".58
What with Derrida somewhat nebulously and quasi-transcendentally trades under the name "fabric of the trace", is met with in our experience of time in the media conditions of the Internet as the concrete practice of modified sign usage and the associated transformations. In place of a hierarchical framework of representation - in which the orientation of signs toward the transparent presence of the signified is central - comes in the Internet a mesh of pragmatic appresences and semiotic interrelations. The temporal interplay of these appresences no longer takes place here in the theoretical horizon of representation, but is bound into the pragmatic context of concrete performed actions. It is this transition from a theoretical temporality of representation to a temporal pragmatics of semiotic action which distinguishes the Internet's media signature.
What does this mean for the specific experience of time which users have in dealing with the Internet? To answer this question it is helpful to contrast the temporal conditions being practised in Internet use with those temporal schemata which are known to us from the use of television. Whereas television prescribes its recipients a fixed linear time track, the timing, that is the temporal arrangement of on-line meetings in MUDs and MOOs takes place through individual agreements between users. Here too, of course, certain regularities in practice quickly establish themselves. But these regularities are appointments you make yourself, which can be made the object of dealings and discussion within the Internet's virtual communities. In place of a prescribed presence, conveyed to passive recipients by the medium of television, come in the Internet's communication services socially constructed times of presence, within which users constitute their identities on the bedrock of writing-based interaction in a context of shared plans for the future.
Furthermore, in the virtual surroundings of text-based communications worlds users themselves have the chance to invent and to program the narrative description of the virtual space in which they, along with other participants, move. Space no longer seems to be a given entity, within which you simply move around passively and on which you can have no influence whatsoever. Rather it becomes a consciously constructed and aesthetically staged artefact. Along with the rooms around which on-line agents move, the times in which respective narratives are played out are also staged by the participants themselves. The peculiar virtual spatiality of MUDs and MOOs corresponds with their specific temporality. Unlike with television or computer games designed for stand alone machines, the inhabitants of the Internet's communicative, text-based worlds of MUD and MOO are not forced into prescribed simulations of space and time, but rather experience space and time as creatively shapeable constructions of their narrative and cooperative imagination. In MUDs and MOOs a theatricalization of space and time takes place. Participants who have and make use of programming rights become the architects and dramaturgists of a virtual theatre, on whose electronic stage the spatio-temporal base structure of our perceptions itself becomes the object to be staged.59
The text-based constitution of these communications landscapes is of central importance for the peculiar narrative spatiality and temporality of MUD and MOO worlds. Through the anaesthetic reduction of communication to the medium of an interactively functioning script the visual, acoustic and tactile cues which we subconsciously presuppose in face to face communication become the object of conscious construction in the medium of writing. The appresent presence of participants in on-line Chat means that, so as to be present as a Chat participant at all, we must describe to the other participants what we look like, how our voice sounds and our skin feels, in what time and space we move, and, all in all, what kind of beings we are in what kind of a world. Our actions and the interactions with our communications partners and virtual objects also take place in the medium of digital writing, that is, in the process of interactive writing and in the mode of the sign itself.
The interpretive nature of our everyday understanding of ourselves and the world as well as the constructed nature of our "ways of worldmaking"60 are in this way becoming explicit and experienceable for everybody. Therein lies an important enlightening dimension of the interactive, writing-based forms of Net communication. In the interactive writing of MUDs and MOOs our dealings with signs prove themselves to be a practice which is concerned not with the representation of an extra-semiotic reality, but with constructive action in and through signs. To this extent it can be said in a quite pragmatic and concrete sense that within the Internet reality becomes the interplay of signifiers, a textual web of mutually referential signs, whose meaning no longer refers to a sign-neutral externality, but constitutes itself intersubjectively in the dimension of concrete interactions.
Against this background I would finally like to come back to Rorty. Rorty suggests apprehending media as literary forms of narrative which through their "sad and sentimental stories"61 can effect solidarity. His hope is that with the help of media we might succeed in bringing together groups of people who have grown up in different social, political and geographical cultures and with varying views by "linking through a thousand small stitches and (...) conjuring up a thousand small similarities."62 This utopia, one which understands "moral progress in the sense of increasing sensitivity and growing receptiveness for the needs of an ever increasing multitude of people and things",63 can be directly related to the transcultural communications practices which are characteristic of virtual communities in the Internet.
In his book Collective Intelligence. Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace the French hypermedia philosopher Pierre Lévy describes the Internet as "the creation of a new medium of communication, thought, and work"64 which will "enable us to think as a group (...) and negotiate practical real-time solutions to the complex problems we must inevitably confront."65 Lévy bases this view on a social vision of the Internet which had already been formulated in 1968 by the heads of the American Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). With a view to "on-line interactive communities" of the future, the two ARPA chiefs Licklider and Taylor wrote: "In most fields they will consist of geographically separated members (...). They will be communities not of common location, but of common interest. (...) life will be happier for the on-line individual because the people with whom one interacts most strongly will be selected more by commonality of interests and goals than by accidents of proximity."66 This quote makes it clear that even in the military context of the ARPANET, which was developed by the US Defence Ministry at the end of the sixties and from which the Internet was later to follow, the social dimension of the network played a central role.
The horizon appearing in the considerations by Lévy, Licklider and Taylor of a dimension of the Internet leading to the formation of transgeographic communities and transcultural solidarities is based not primarily, and not solely, in content, but already results from the fact that interactive networks reveal forms of communication which ease the emergence of transversal interest-based communites. In IRC, MUDs and MOOs it becomes possible for people separated in space and time, and to this extent living in different worlds, to live virtually in a common world whose basic spatio-temporal coordinates they construct together in a cooperative process of negotiation. The enlightening dimension of interactive Net communication mentioned above - which can bring about an awareness of the interpreted and constructed nature of our day-to-day understanding of ourselves and the world - plays an important role in this. For the recognition of the contingent character of even our deepest beliefs represents an important basis for transcultural dialogue which is concerned precisely with interweaving contingent beliefs of varying origin with one another.
The philosophical backgrounds which codetermine the social, political and enlightening aspects of new media are, admittedly, not considered by Rorty, whose considerations have until now been restricted to classical mass media such as "the novel, the movie, and the TV program".67 The reason for this lies not least in that Rorty so sharply delimits the public-political sphere of media from the esoteric vocabularies of philosophy. Philosophical vocabularies are, on his view, to be understood as their authors' private projects of self-creation, allowing little to be said about their relevance for common sense. And if philosophical vocabularies do find their way to the common man, which according to Rorty is also quite possible in exceptional cases, then this occurs "in the long run",68 that is, in the spectrum of historical developments which are to be measured on the scale of centuries.69
In my view corrections are to be made to this conservative estimation of the significance of philosophy in the age of new media technologies. The parallels described which exist between Derrida's Grammatology and the transformations occurring in the Internet have, I hope, made it clear up to a point that the "process of European linguistic practices changing at a faster and faster rate",70 described by Rorty himself in the first chapter of his book Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, simultaneously leads to more rapid and more radical changes in the philosophical bedrock of common sense than Rorty is prepared to admit. For this reason Rorty's comments in which he calls "the esoteric matters with which Derrida [is] obsessed (e.g. the presupposed primacy of speech over writing)"71 "a vagary on his [i.e. Derrida's] part"72 which is "irrelevant (at least so far as we can presently see) to the public life"73 also seem to me to be in need of revision. Statements of this kind ignore the media-philosophical significance due to Derrida's considerations in the context of new communications and information technology.74 A media-pragmatic reading of the Grammatology can help in gaining an insight into the interplay between the development of philosophical vocabularies, the establishment of new media technologies, and changes in the common man's everyday understanding of self and the world.
If one interprets the technical media of modernity as machines, with whose help whole societies can acquire new vocabularies, new temporalities and new ways of worldmaking in a relatively short time, then it becomes clear that issues of media politics have genuine philosophical dimensions and that philosophical theories of media have eminently political aspects. These relationships are in need of a differentiated analysis, one in league with neither the cultural critique of a post-historical media eschatology nor with the retreat of philosophy to a supposedly private domain of individual self-creation. What I have in mind is, in contrast to this, an active interplay between media philosophy and media politics in the Internet age, one which critically codetermines new technologies. An interplay such as this would be of particular importance in the conditions of increasing commercialization of new technologies. For through the unreflected commercialization of interactive networks there exists the danger that the opportunities contained by the Internet might turn into risks.
Translated by Andrew Inkpin
Anders, Günther (1956): Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. Über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution, vol. 1, Munich, Beck.
Baert, Patrick (ed.) (1999): Time in Modern Intellectual Thought, Amsterdam/New York, Elsevier (forthcoming).
Baumgartner, Hans-Michael (ed.) (1993): Das Rätsel der Zeit. Philosophische Analysen, Freiburg/Munich, Alber.
Benjamin, Walter (1969): The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, in: Benjamin, Illuminations, New York, Schocken Books, pp. 217-251 [French original in: Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, vol. 5/1, 1936, pp. 40-68].
Bolter, Jay David (1991): Writing Space. The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing, Hillsdale (N.J.) and London, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bruckman, Amy (1997): MOOSE Crossing: Construction, Community, and Learning in a Networked Virtual World for Kids, PhD Dissertation, MIT Media Lab, May 1997 (http://asb.www.media.mit.edu/people/asb/thesis/index.html).
Derrida, Jacques (1976): Of Grammatology, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press
Derrida, Jacques (1982): Margins of Philosophy, New York/London, Harvester.
Derrida, Jacques (1987): The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Derrida, Jacques (1992): The Other Heading. Reflections on Today's Europe. Bloomington/Indianapolis, Indiana University Press.
Gimmler, Antje / Sandbothe, Mike / Zimmerli, Walther Ch. (1997) (eds.): Die Wiederentdeckung der Zeit. Analysen-Reflexionen-Konzepte, Darmstadt, Primus-Verlag and Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Goodman, Nelson (1978): Ways of Worldmaking, Hassocks, Harvester.
Griffin, David Ray (ed.) (1986): Physics and the Ultimate Significance of Time. Bohm, Prigogine, and Process Philosophy, New York, State University of New York Press.
Heidegger, Martin (1977): The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays, New York/London, Harper and Row.
Krohn, Wolfgang/ Küppers, Günter / Nowotny, Helga (ed.) (1990): Selforganization. Portrait of a Scientific Revolution, Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Landow, George P. (1992): Hypertext. The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology, Baltimore/London, John Hopkins University Press.
Le Poidevin, Robin / McBeath, Murray (1993): The Philosophy of Time, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Lévy, Pierre (1997): Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace, New York and London, Plenum Press.
Licklider, J.C.R. / Taylor, Robert W.: The Computer as a Communication Device, in: Science & Technology, no. 76, April 1968, pp. 21-31.
Lübbe, Hermann (1992): Im Zug der Zeit. Verkürzter Aufenthalt in der Gegenwart, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, Springer.
McLuhan, Marshall (1995): Understandig Media. The Extensions of Man, London, Routledge (original: New York 1964).
Musil, Robert (1954): The Man without Qualities, vol. II(2), London, Secker and Warburg (German original first published: Berlin, 1930-1933).
Prigogine, Ilya (1973): Time, Irreversibility and Structure, in: Physicist's Conception of Nature, ed. Jagdish Mehra , Dordrecht/Boston, D. Reidel Pub.
Prigogine, Ilya (1983): Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature, New York, Bantam Books.
Prigogine, Ilya (1988): Vom Sein zum Werden. Zeit und Komplexität in den Naturwissenschaften, München, Piper.
Prigogine, Ilya (1997): The End of Certainty. Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature, New York u.a.: Free Press.
Prigogine, Ilya / Isabelle Stengers (1981): Dialog mit der Natur. Neue Wege naturwissenschaftlichen Denkens, Munich, Piper.
Prigogine, Ilya / Isabelle Stengers (1988): Entre le Temps et l´ Éternité, Paris, Fayard.
Rheingold, Howard (1994): The Virtual Community. Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, New York, Harper Perennial.
Rorty, Richard (1980): Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Oxford, Blackwell.
Rorty, Richard (1989): Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, Richard (1991): Essays on Heidegger and others, Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, Richard (1993b): Putnam and the Relativist Menace, in: The Journal of Philosophy, vol. XC, no. 9, September, pp. 443-461.
Rorty, Richard (1993c): Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality, in: On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993, eds. Stephen Shute and Susan Hurley, New York, Basic Books, pp. 111-134.
Rorty, Richard (1994a): Hoffnung statt Erkenntnis. Eine Einführung in die pragmatische Philosophie, Vienna, Passagen.
Rorty, Richard (1995a): Habermas, Derrida, and the Functions of Philosophy, in: Revue Internationale de Philosophie, vol. 49, no. 194, pp. 437-459.
Rorty, Richard (1995b): Philosophy and the Future, in: Rorty and Pragmatism, ed. Herman J. Saatkamp, Nashville and London, Vanderbild University Press.
Rorty, Richard (1996): Remarks on Deconstruction and Pragmatism, in: Deconstruction and Pragmatism, ed. Chantal Mouffe, London and New York, Routledge, pp. 13-18.
Rorty, Richard (1998): Achieving Our Country. Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America, Cambridge (Mass.) und London, Harvard University Press.
Sandbothe, Mike (1993): Zeit und Medien. Postmoderne Medientheorien im Spannungsfeld von Heideggers 'Sein und Zeit', in: Medien und Zeit. Forum für historische Kommunikationsforschung, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 14-20.
Sandbothe, Mike (1994): Die Verzeitlichung der Zeit. Grundtendenzen der modernen Zeitphilosophie und die aktuelle Wiederentdeckung der Zeit, in: Glaube und Denken. Jahrbuch der Karl-Heim-Gesellschaft, vol. 7, pp. 108-133.
Sandbothe, Mike (1996a): Mediale Zeiten. Zur Veränderung unserer Zeiterfahrung durch die elektronischen Medien, in: Synthetische Welten. Kunst, Künstlichkeit und Kommunikationsmedien, ed. Eckhart Hammel, Essen, Blaue Eule, pp. 133-156.
Sandbothe, Mike (1996b): Interactivity-Hypertextuality-Transversality. A Media-philosophical Analysis of the Internet, on-line publication, http://www.uni-magdeburg.de/~iphi/ms/tele/e_top.html (German version in: Mythos Internet, eds. Stefan Münker and Alexander Rösler, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1997, pp. 56-82).
Sandbothe, Mike (1997a): Theatrale Aspekte des Internet, in: Theatralität, ed. Herbert Willems and Martin Jurga, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.
Sandbothe, Mike (1997b): Transversale Medienwelten. Philosophische Überlegungen zum Internet, in: Medien-Welten-Wirklichkeiten, ed. Gianni Vattimo and Wolfgang Welsch, Munich, Fink, 1997, pp. 59-84.
Sandbothe, Mike (1998): Die Verzeitlichung der Zeit. Grundtendenzen der modernen Zeitdebatte in Philosophie und Wissenschaft, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.
Sandbothe, Mike (1999): The Temporalization of Time in Modern Philosophy, in: Time in Modern Intellectual Thought, ed. Patrick Baert, Amsterdam/New York, Elsevier (forthcoming); on-line preprint: http://www.uni-magdeburg.de/~iphi/ms/ms_time.html.
Sandbothe, Mike / Zimmerli, Walther Ch. (eds.) (1994): Zeit-Medien-Wahrnehmung, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Simon, Josef (1995): Philosophy of the Sign, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Turkle, Sherry (1995): Life on the Screen. Identitiy in the Age of the Internet, New York, Simon & Schuster.
Ulmer, Gregory L. (1985): Applied Grammatology. Post(e) Pedagogy from Jacques Derrida to Joseph Beuys, Baltimore and London, John Hopkins University Press.
Vattimo, Gianni (1992): The Transparent Society, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Virilio, Paul (1984): L´Horizon Négativ, Paris, Galilée.
Virilio, Paul (1994) The Vision Machine, Bloomington, Indiana University Press (original: La machine de vision, Paris, Editions Galilâee, 1988)
Virilio, Paul (1991): Die Ästhetik des Verschwindens. Ein Gespräch zwischen Fred Forest und Paul Virilio, in: Digitaler Schein. Ästhetik der elektronischen Medien, ed. Florian Rötzer, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, pp. 334-342.
Virilio, Paul (1990): L´Inertie Polaire, Paris, Christian Bourgois Èditeur.
Welsch, Wolfgang (1987): Unsere postmoderne Moderne, Weinheim, VCH.
Welsch, Wolfgang (1988): Introduction, in: Wege aus der Moderne. Schlüsseltexte der Postmoderne-Diskussion, ed. Wolfgang Welsch, Weinheim, VCH, pp. 1-43.
Welsch, Wolfgang (1996): Transculturality - The Changing Form of Cultures Today in: Intercultural Studies: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Prodeedings of a lecture series held at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, January to May 1996, ed. Jörg Roche, Vancouver: Centre for Intercultural Language Studies, University of British Columbia, 1996, S. 106-135.
Welsch, Wolfgang / Sandbothe, Mike (1997): Postmodernity as a Philosophical Concept, in: International Postmodernism: Theory and Literary Practice, ed. Hans Bertens and Douwe Fokkema, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 75-87.
Wheeler, John Archibald (1979): Frontiers of Time, in: Problems in the Foundation of Physics. Proceedings of the International School of Physics 'Enrico Fermi', Course LXXII, ed. G. Toraldi di Francia, Amsterdam/New York/Oxford, pp. 395-497.
Zimmerli, Walther Ch. / Sandbothe, Mike (eds.) (1993): Klassiker der modernen Zeitphilosophie, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.